UserEvidence acquires Zealot: adds advocacy + references, backed by $7M in new funding

Comparing Influitive vs. UserEvidence

Influitive built the advocacy playbook a decade ago. UserEvidence connects advocates, references, and customer proof in one platform, right inside the tools your team already uses every day.

The TL;DR

Influitive pioneered advocacy communities but its portal-first model now emphasizes log-ins and activity stats more than usable proof.

Programs demand constant admin, and advocates often engage for points or swag instead of genuine recognition. Participation looks busy but it rarely moves pipeline.

If you want a community portal built on points, badges, and rewards, Influitive can work.

If you want to activate advocates and communities—with proof, references, and evidence in one place your team already uses—UserEvidence is what you’re looking for.

What Influitive does well

Where Influitive falls short

What we heard from mutual customers

“Our advocates never logged into the community unless it was Friday and they needed to blow off time.”
Customer Advocacy Manager
Enterprise SaaS
“We bribed people with swag. With Influitive, they felt like they were showing up for points, not belief.”
Customer Marketing Leader
Enterprise SaaS
“Destination communities where you have to log in to some random tool are too much friction going forward.”
Customer Advocacy Manager
Enterprise SaaS

Portal-based community vs. always-on system for advocates, references, and evidence

UserEvidence brings advocates, references, and third-party-verified proof together—embedded directly in Slack, Salesforce, Highspot, Seismic, and email—so teams don’t have to manage another portal.

Who it’s built for

Advocacy and community managers running destination programs

GTM teams (Sales, CS, PMM, Customer Marketing) + advocacy/community managers

Motion

Community engagement and gamified participation

Advocates, references, evidence, and communities embedded where GTM teams already work.

Time to value

9–11 months*, dependent on building a large, active community

<45 days to adoption*; 1.3 months to ROI** 

Strength

Pioneered community advocacy and proven at driving participation

Delivers proof, advocates, references — plus advocate community programs

Limitation

Portal log-ins, gamification, and points drive vanity metrics; requires heavy admin to sustain

Young, fast-moving roadmap; core flows live today, deeper embeds expanding weekly

Influitive vs. UserEvidence: what GTM teams can (and can’t) do

CAPABILITY
Advocate and customer community hubs

Supports destination-style community hubs with gamification

Supports Slack- and hub-based advocate communities designed with gamification

Embedded advocacy

Requires community log-in

Requests surface in the tools teams already use

Advocate burnout tracking

Limited visibility

Automated fatigue tracking + content deflection to protect advocates

Reference management

Buried in a gamified hub, hard for reps to use

One-click fulfillment + proactive AI matching in-flow

Deal-stage activation

Manual campaigns run by admins

AI-matched customers surfaced at the right moment

Sales & CS access

Proof sits in portals, hard to access in flow

Embedded in Slack, Salesforce, Highspot, Seismic, email, in-product

Testimonial and quote creation

No built-in capture

Verified, sales-ready quotes and testimonials

Statistical proof and ROI outcomes

None

Scalable statistical proof from your customer base (ROI, usage, outcomes)

Why teams switch to UserEvidence (in their own words)

Here’s how customers describe what it’s like to use Influitive after years of shifting focus and investment.

01

Portals create friction

proof sits behind log-ins, disconnected from Sales and CS

02

Heavy admin lift

advocates engage for points and rewards, not meaningful impact

03

No centralization

programs take constant work to sustain and drag ROI to 9–11 months

How users rate Influitive vs. UserEvidence

Source: *Independent survey of 185 customer marketing leaders (Captivate Collective, 2025 Customer Marketing Tech Landscape) and **UserEvidence customer survey (October 2025).

Survey respondents (n)

57

35

Average satisfaction (out of 10)

7.1

8.8

Ease of use (out of 5)

3.5

4.3

Customer success (out of 5)

4.3

4.7

Product reliability (out of 5)

3.8

4.5

Time to ROI

9–11 months*

 1.3 months to ROI** 

What you actually get with UserEvidence

Advocates

Evidence

References

Stop relying on points and portals.
Start winning with proof

UserEvidence is built for what GTM teams need now and in the future.