UserEvidence acquires Zealot: adds advocacy + references, backed by $7M in new funding

Comparing Peerbound vs. UserEvidence

Peerbound automates customer proof for sellers. UserEvidence makes it credible, compliant, and scalable across your entire GTM team.

The TL;DR

Peerbound is fast. It listens to sales calls and surfaces AI-generated quotes, reviews, and stories in Slack or email. AEs love the speed.

But speed without structure breaks fast. Peerbound’s automation stops short of the verified, compliant workflows marketing and customer teams need.

UserEvidence gives you proof you can trust — approved, organized, and measurable across every part of GTM.

If you want a tool that can help you turn old call recordings into customer stories, Peerbound can work.

If you want verified proof connected to advocates, references, and community your GTM team actually uses—UserEvidence is for you.

What Peerbound does well

Where Peerbound falls short

What we heard from mutual customers

“Peerbound was strong for case studies, but we needed deeper ROI data and aggregate insights. UserEvidence gave us both.”
Customer Advocacy Manager
Enterprise SaaS
“Peerbound has flexibility, but not the enterprise maturity we needed. UserEvidence helps us amplify what 5,000+ customers are doing with our product.”
Customer Marketing Leader
Enterprise SaaS
“Full control over survey design and faster data collection tipped the scale toward UserEvidence.”
Customer Marketing Specialist
Advocacy, Large Enterprise Software Company

Proof tool vs. connected system for customer proof and activation

Peerbound automates and repackages existing proof from calls and reviews—fast but shallow. UserEvidence captures, verifies, and connects new proof to advocates, references, and campaigns so every GTM team can activate it confidently

Who it’s built for

Content and PMM teams creating customer stories from Gong calls and existing feedback

GTM teams (Sales, CS, PMM, Customer Marketing) that need verified proof, active advocates, and connected community programs

AI purpose

Reactive — mines existing calls and reviews to auto-write stories

Proactive and intentional — captures and verifies the exact proof sellers need, structured for GTM use

System scope

Proof-only — stops at content creation

Full system — connects evidence, advocates, references, and community in one continuous motion

Time to value

~4–5 months to ROI*

<45 days to adoption*; 1.3 months to ROI**

Strength

Fast at generating AI-written stories; minimal setup for content teams

Verified, compliant proof with built-in advocate, reference, and community workflows GTM teams actually use

Limitation

Stops at story creation — no data-backed proof, advocacy, or reference capabilities

Expanding integrations across Slack, Salesforce, Highspot, and Seismic — built for scale

Peerbound vs. UserEvidence: what GTM teams can (and can’t) do

CAPABILITY
AI-assisted story creation

Generates AI-written proof from call recordings and reviews — fast but unverified

Generates verified, AI-summarized testimonials and data-driven stories with approval guardrails

Governance and approvals

Basic approvals, no anonymization or compliance workflows

Full approval, anonymization, and compliance layers built in

Aggregate ROI data

Limited to anecdotal insights from calls

Captures measurable ROI and usage data through structured surveys and analytics

Share proof in GTM tools

Shares proof via Slack and limited integrations like Gong or G2

Embeds verified proof directly in Slack, Salesforce, Highspot, and Seismic

Third-party validation

No external or independent verification of AI-generated content

Verified by UserEvidence’s trusted data layer — citation-ready and independently validated

Activate and track advocates

No advocacy or reference activation workflows

Identifies, segments, and activates advocates through mission-based programs

Manage customer references

No structured reference management

AI-assisted matching engine connects the right advocate to each deal

Centralize proof + advocates

Content-only system with little lifecycle visibility

Unified platform for advocates, references, and evidence that moves with your GTM team

Why teams switch to UserEvidence (in their own words)

Here’s how Peerbound customers describe the point where they outgrew the platform.

01

Can’t create verified proof

Only repackages snippets from calls and reviews — nothing customer-approved or auditable.

02

Too many tools to manage

Handles stories, but teams still need separate systems for advocates, references, and analytics.

03

No measurable impact

Great for quick storytelling, but lacks ROI data and trackable customer evidence.

How users rate Peerbound vs. UserEvidence

Source: Independent survey of 185 customer marketing leaders (Captivate Collective, 2025 Customer Marketing Tech Landscape).

Survey respondents (n)

14

35

Average satisfaction (out of 10)

9.3

8.8

Onboarding implementation (out of 5)

4.5

4.6

Technical support experience (out of 5)

4.5

4.6

Customer success experience (out of 5)

4.7

4.7

Product reliability (out of 5)

4.8

4.5

Product ease of use (out of 5)

4.9

4.3

What you actually get with UserEvidence

Three connected products—built to turn customer input into verified, activated proof your entire GTM team can use.

Advocates

Evidence

References

Stop settling for unused proof.
Start closing with evidence buyers trust.

Go live in weeks with verified proof, active advocates, and ready references your GTM team can
actually use—directly inside the tools they already rely on.